Warren M. Elofson, John A. Woods, and William B. Todd (eds), The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, Vol. 3: Party, Parliament, and the American War: 1774-1780

Contents
Find Location in text

Main Text

Speech at the Conclusion of the Poll3 November 1774

Source: Mr. Edmund Burke's Speeches at his Arrival at Bristol, and at the Conclusion of the Poll, 2nd edn., J. Dodsley, London, 1774

The Bristol election ended on 3 November when Cruger had 3,656, Burke 2,707, Brickdale 2,456, and Lord Clare 283 votes. Much of what follows is Burke's response to the challenge to his seat by Brickdale. However, of more pg 64interest and importance is his celebrated argument about the responsibilities of M.P.s to their electors. His insistence upon the need for representatives to use their own judgement on important matters rather than blindly following the will of the electorate was consistent with traditional opinion which con-sidered the bulk of the electors ill-equipped to grapple with the affairs of state.1 The 'people', wrote one pundit in the mid-1770s 'are much … as a person under age, who must have guardians to manage his estate, not according to his particular inclination, but his real interest'. Through our constitution, 'the wisdom and virtue of a few, are put in place of the levity and weakness of the many'.2 In the 1770s, of course, this view was frequently being challenged particularly in reformist literature, which placed a great emphasis on the importance of the people (and the need for their regular intervention) in the government process.3 It was a view, moreover, which would help to create substantial difficulties for Burke in Bristol where it could clearly be contrasted with the ideas of Cruger. 'It has ever been my opinion that the electors have a right to instruct their members,' the latter had proclaimed when thanking his voters. 'For my part, I shall always think it my duty in Parliament to be guided by your counsels and instructions: I shall consider myself the servant of my constituents, not their master—subservient to their will, not superior to it.'4 Ultimately, Burke's attitude was to play an important role in his decision not to contest the election in the city in 1780.5

Mr. EDMUND BURKE's SPEECHNovember 3, 1774

Gentlemen,

I Cannot avoid sympathizing strongly with the feelings of the Gentle-man who has received the same honour that you have conferred on pg 65me. If he, who was bred and passed his whole Life amongst you; if he, who, through the easy gradations of acquaintance, friendship, and esteem, has obtained the honour, which seems of itself, naturally and almost insensibly, to meet with those, who, by the even tenour of pleasing manners and social virtues, slide into the love and confidence of their fellow-citizens;—if he cannot speak but with great emotion on this subject, surrounded as he is on all sides with his old friends; you will have the goodness to excuse me, if my real, unaffected embarrassment prevents me from expressing my gratitude to you as I ought.

I was brought hither under the disadvantage of being unknown, even by sight, to any of you. No previous canvass was made for me. I was put in nomination after the poll was opened. I did not appear until it was far advanced. If, under all these accumulated disadvantages, your good opinion has carried me to this happy point of success; you will pardon me, if I can only say to you collectively, as I said to you individually, simply and plainly, I thank you—I am obliged to you—I am not insensible of your kindness.

This is all that I am able to say for the inestimable favour you have conferred upon me. But I cannot be satisfied, without saying a little more in defence of the right you have to confer such a favour. The person that appeared here as counsel for the Candidate, who so long and so earnestly solicited your votes,1 thinks proper to deny, that a very great part of you have any votes to give.2 He fixes a standard period of time in his own imagination, not what the law defines, but merely what the convenience of his Client suggests, by which he would cut off, at one stroke, all those freedoms, which are the dearest privileges of your Corporation; which the common law authorizes: which your Magistrates are compelled to grant; which come duly authenticated into this Court; and are saved in the clearest words, and with the most religious care and tenderness, in that very act of Parliament, which was made to regulate the Elections by Freemen, and to prevent all possible abuses in making them.3

I do not intend to argue the matter here. My learned Counsel4 has supported your Cause with his usual Ability; the worthy Sheriffs have pg 66acted with their usual equity, and I have no doubt, that the same equity, which dictates the return, will guide the final determination. I had the honour, in conjunction with many far wiser men, to contribute a very small assistance, but however some assistance, to the forming the Judicature which is to try such questions.1 It would be unnatural in me, to doubt the Justice of that Court, in the trial of my own cause, to which I have been so active to give jurisdiction over every other.

I assure the worthy Freemen, and this Corporation, that, if the Gentleman perseveres in the intentions, which his present warmth dictates to him, I will attend their cause with diligence, and I hope with effect. For, if I know any thing of myself, it is not my own Interest in it, but my full conviction, that induces me to tell you—I think there is not a shadow of doubt in the case.

I do not imagine that you find me rash in declaring myself, or very forward in troubling you. From the beginning to the end of the election, I have kept silence in all matters of discussion. I have never asked a question of a voter on the other side, or supported a doubtful vote on my own. I respected the abilities of my managers; I relied on the candour of the court. I think the worthy sheriffs will bear me witness, that I have never once made an attempt to impose upon their reason, to surprize their justice, or to ruffle their temper. I stood on the hustings (except when I gave my thanks to those who favoured me with their votes) less like a Candidate, than an unconcerned Spectator of a public proceeding. But here the face of things is altered. Here is an attempt for a general massacre of Suffrages; an attempt, by a promiscuous carnage of friends and foes, to exterminate above two thousand votes, including seven hundred polled for the Gentleman himself, who now complains, and who would destroy the Friends whom he has obtained, only because he cannot obtain as many of them as he wishes.

How he will be permitted, in another place, to stultify and disable himself, and to plead against his own acts, is another question. The law will decide it. I shall only speak of it as it concerns the propriety of public conduct in this city. I do not pretend to lay down rules of decorum for other Gentlemen. They are best judges of the mode of proceeding that will recommend them to the favour of their fellow-citizens. But I confess, I should look rather awkward, if I had been the very first to produce the new copies of freedom, if I had persisted pg 67in producing them to the last; if I had ransacked, with the most Critical Apparatusunremitting industry, and the most penetrating research, the remotest corners of the kingdom to discover them; if I were then, all at once, to turn short, and declare, that I had been sporting all this while with the right of election: and that I had been drawing out a Poll, upon no sort of rational grounds, which disturbed the peace of my fellow-citizens for a month together—I really, for my part, should appear awkward under such circumstances.

It would be still more awkward in me, if I were gravely to look the sheriffs in the face, and to tell them, they were not to determine my cause on my own principles; nor to make the return upon those votes, upon which I had rested my election. Such would be my appearance to the court and magistrates.

But how should I appear to the Voters themselves? If I had gone round to the citizens intitled to Freedom, and squeezed them by the hand—"Sir, I humbly beg your Vote—I shall be eternally thankful— may I hope for the honour of your support?—Well!—come—we shall see you at the Council-house."—If I were then to deliver them to my managers, pack them into tallies, vote them off in court, and when I heard from the Bar—"Such a one only! and such a one for ever!—he's my man!"—"Thank you, good sir—Hah! my worthy friend! thank you kindly—that's an honest fellow—how is your good family?"—Whilst these words were hardly out of my mouth, if I should have wheeled round at once, and told them—"Get you gone, you pack of worthless fellows! you have no votes—you are Usurpers! you are intruders on the rights of real freemen! I will have nothing to do with you! you ought never to have been produced at this Election, and the sheriffs ought not to have admitted you to poll."

Gentlemen, I should make a strange figure, if my conduct had been of this sort. I am not so old an acquaintance of yours as the worthy Gentleman. Indeed I could not have ventured on such kind of free-doms with you. But I am bound, and I will endeavour, to have justice done to the rights of Freemen; even though I should, at the same time, be obliged to vindicate the former part of my antagonist's conduct* against his own present inclinations.

I owe myself, in all things, to all the freemen of this city. My particular friends have a demand on me, that I should not deceive their pg 68expectations. Never was cause or man supported with more constancy, more activity, more spirit. I have been supported with a zeal indeed and heartiness in my friends, which (if their object had been at all proportioned to their endeavours) could never be sufficiently com-mended. They supported me upon the most liberal principles. They wished that the members for Bristol should be chosen for the City, and for their Country at large, and not for themselves.

So far they are not disappointed. If I possess nothing else, I am sure I possess the temper that is fit for your service. I know nothing of Bristol, but by the favours I have received, and the virtues I have seen exerted in it.

I shall ever retain, what I now feel, the most perfect and grateful attachment to my friends—and I have no enmities; no resentment. I never can consider fidelity to engagements, and constancy in friend-ships, but with the highest approbation; even when those noble qualities are employed against my own pretensions. The Gentleman, who is not fortunate as I have been in this contest, enjoys, in this respect, a consolation full of honour both to himself and to his friends. They have certainly left nothing undone for his service.

As for the trifling petulance, which the rage of party stirs up in little minds, though it should shew itself even in this court, it has not made the slightest impression on me. The highest flight of such clamorous birds is winged in an inferior region of the air. We hear them, and we look upon them, just as you, Gentlemen, when you enjoy the serene air on your lofty rocks, look down upon the Gulls, that skim the mud of your river, when it is exhausted of its tide.

I am sorry I cannot conclude, without saying a word on a topick touched upon by my worthy Colleague. I wish that topick had been passed by; at a time when I have so little leisure to discuss it. But since he has thought proper to throw it out, I owe you a clear explanation of my poor sentiments on that subject.

He tells you, that "the topick of Instructions has occasioned much altercation and uneasiness in this City;" and he expresses himself (if I understand him rightly) in favour of the coercive authority of such instructions.

Certainly, Gentlemen, it ought to be the happiness and glory of a Representative, to live in the strictest union, the closest cor-respondence, and the most unreserved communication with his constituents. Their wishes ought to have great weight with him; their pg 69opinion high respect; their business unremitted attention. It is his duty to sacrifice his repose, his pleasures, his satisfactions, to theirs; and, above all, ever, and in all cases, to prefer their interest to his own. But, his unbiassed opinion, his mature judgement, his enlightened con-science, he ought not to sacrifice to you; to any man, or to any sett of men living. These he does not derive from your pleasure; no, nor from the Law and the Constitution. They are a trust from Providence, for the abuse of which he is deeply answerable. Your Representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgement; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.

My worthy Colleague says, his Will ought to be subservient to yours. If that be all, the thing is innocent. If Government were a matter of Will upon any side, yours, without question, ought to be superior. But Government and Legislation are matters of reason and judgement, and not of inclination; and, what sort of reason is that, in which the determination precedes the discussion; in which one sett of men deliberate, and another decide; and where those who form the con-clusion are perhaps three hundred miles distant from those who hear the arguments?

To deliver an opinion, is the right of all men; that of Constituents is a weighty and respectable opinion, which a Representative ought always to rejoice to hear; and which he ought always most seriously to consider. But authoritative instructions; Mandates issued, which the Member is bound blindly and implicitly to obey, to vote, and to argue for, though contrary to the clearest conviction of his judgement and conscience; these are things utterly unknown to the laws of this land, and which arise from a fundamental Mistake of the whole order and tenour of our Constitution.

Parliament is not a Congress of Ambassadors from different and hostile interests; which interests each must maintain, as an Agent and Advocate, against other Agents and Advocates; but Parliament is a deliberative Assembly of one Nation, with one Interest, that of the whole; where, not local Purposes, not local Prejudices ought to guide, but the general Good, resulting from the general Reason of the whole. You chuse a Member indeed; but when you have chosen him, he is not Member of Bristol, but he is a Member of Parliament. If the local Constituent should have an Interest, or should form an hasty Opinion, evidently opposite to the real good of the rest of the Community, the Member for that place ought to be as far, as any other, from any pg 70endeavour to give it Effect. I beg pardon for saying so much on this subject. I have been unwillingly drawn into it; but I shall ever use a respectful frankness of communication with you. Your faithful friend, your devoted servant, I shall be to the end of my life: A flatterer you do not wish for. On this point of instructions, however, I think it scarcely possible, we ever can have any sort of difference. Perhaps I may give you too much, rather than too little trouble.

From the first hour I was encouraged to court your favour to this happy day of obtaining it, I have never promised you any thing, but humble and persevering endeavours to do my duty. The weight of that duty, I confess, makes me tremble; and whoever well considers what it is, of all things in the world will fly from what has the least likeness to a positive and precipitate engagement. To be a good Member of Parliament, is, let me tell you, no easy task; especially at this time, when there is so strong a disposition to run into the perilous extremes of servile compliance, or wild popularity. To unite circumspection with vigour, is absolutely necessary; but it is extremely difficult. We are now Members for a rich commercial City; this City, however, is but a part of a rich commercial Nation, the Interests of which are various, multiform, and intricate. We are Members for that great Nation, which however is itself but part of a great Empire, extended by our Virtue and our Fortune to the farthest limits of the East and of the West. All these wide-spread Interests must be considered; must be compared; must be reconciled if possible. We are Members for a free Country; and surely we all know, that the machine of a free Constitution is no simple thing; but as intricate and as delicate, as it is valuable. We are Members in a great and ancient Monarchy; and we must preserve religiously, the true legal rights of the Sovereign, which form the Key-stone that binds together the noble and well-constructed Arch of our Empire and our Constitution. A Constitution made up of balanced Powers must ever be a critical thing. As such I mean to touch that part of it which comes within my reach. I know my Inability, and I wish for support from every Quarter. In particular I shall aim at the friendship, and shall cultivate the best Correspondence, of the worthy Colleague you have given me.

I trouble you no farther than once more to thank you all; you, Gentlemen, for your Favours; the Candidates for their temperate and polite behaviour; and the Sheriffs, for a Conduct which may give a Model for all who are in public Stations.

Notes

* Mr. Brickdale opened his poll, it seems, with a tally of those very kind of freemen, and voted many hundreds of them.

Notes Settings

Notes

Editor’s Note
1 See C. S. Emden, The People and the Constitution, 2nd edn., Oxford, 1956, pp. 22–5; B. Kemp, 'Patriotism, Pledges, and the People', in A Century of Conflict 1850–1950: Essays for A. J. P. Taylor, ed. M. Gilbert, London, 1966, pp. 37–46; Dame Lucy Sutherland, 'Edmund Burke and the Relations between Members of Parliament and their Constituents', Studies in Burke and his Time, x (1968–9), 1005–21; W. M. Elofson, 'The Rockingham Whigs and the Country Tradition', Parliamentary History, viii (1989), 103–9. Burke was probably himself responsible for a review in the Annual Register for 1765 of Spiritual and Temporal Liberty of Subjects in England by Anthony Ellys (1690–1761), which quotes a long passage from Ellys similar to the view which Burke expresses in this speech (T. W. Copeland, Edmund Burke: Six Essays, London, 1950, pp. 132–3). There is an extract from Ellys in Mrs. Burke's hand at Northampton (A.xxxi.7), the source noted by Burke.
Editor’s Note
2 'A General View of the Excellence of the British Constitution. With a Short Refutation of Doctor Price's Republican View', London Chronicle, 9 May 1776.
Editor’s Note
3 See, for instance, John Cartwright, Take Your Choice, London, 1776; James Burgh, Political Disquisitions, 2 vols., London, 1774; Richard Price, Observations on the Nature of Civil Liberty, the Principles of Government and the Justice and Policy of the War with America, London, 1776.
Editor’s Note
4 Felix Farley's Bristol Journal, 5 November 1774.
Editor’s Note
5 See below, pp. 620–3.
Editor’s Note
1 Henry Hobhouse was Brickdale's counsel.
Editor’s Note
2 Brickdale petitioned against the return of Cruger and Burke.
Editor’s Note
3 3 Geo. III, c. 15.
Editor’s Note
4 Thomas Symons or Symonds.
Editor’s Note
1 Under Grenville's Controverted Elections Act.
Critical Apparatus
67.2 penetatring | penetrating 1 +.
logo-footer Copyright © 2019. All rights reserved. Access is brought to you by Log out